<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney accesses &#8220;every table and every meeting&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roguelystated.com/2007/06/25/cheney-accesses-every-table-and-every-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roguelystated.com/2007/06/25/cheney-accesses-every-table-and-every-meeting/</link>
	<description>Commentary, analysis, and reporting on US and international security.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:07:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Tart</title>
		<link>http://www.roguelystated.com/2007/06/25/cheney-accesses-every-table-and-every-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Tart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roguelystated.com/2007/06/25/cheney-accesses-every-table-and-every-meeting/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>How will the Cheney factor affect VP nominations for the 2008 race, I wonder.  Given that Cheney&#039;s approval ratings are even lower than Bush&#039;s, might the GOP nominee deliberately choose the anti-Cheney?  Someone who will pledge not to meddle?  Or maybe it will be the opposite, and candidates will use the beefed up VP role as a reason to choose an international security expert (I hear wildly unsubstantiated rumors about Hillary courting Wes Clark).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will the Cheney factor affect VP nominations for the 2008 race, I wonder.  Given that Cheney&#8217;s approval ratings are even lower than Bush&#8217;s, might the GOP nominee deliberately choose the anti-Cheney?  Someone who will pledge not to meddle?  Or maybe it will be the opposite, and candidates will use the beefed up VP role as a reason to choose an international security expert (I hear wildly unsubstantiated rumors about Hillary courting Wes Clark).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

